Friday, September 3, 2010

No ordinary woman

September 3, 1943, sixty-seven years ago today, my mother and father were married. 

Continuing this week’s theme of wells and marriage, and in my late parent's honor, here is an interesting water story from The Book of Joshua.

When the Hebrew tribes invaded Canaan sometime around the 14th century BCE, the city of Debir in the northern Negev proved a tough town to conquer.


As the commander in charge of the southern campaign, Caleb offered an incentive to whoever successfully captured the city - his daughter Acsah’s hand in marriage. Her cousin Othniel rose to the challenge and won both the battle and the bride.

Offering a daughter as the prize for military victory hints at the position of women in that society, but this story also shows us the resourcefulness of this woman. She is not just a trophy wife. She understands the realities of life.

For her dowry, Acsah asks her father for farmland. She knows that marriage alone is not enough, that a young family needs some real estate as well as love to live on.

While the men divide up the land, this woman is thinking about the practicalities of raising a family there. And she is not going to let the opportunity slip.

The Negev is not an easy place to farm.   Its name means ‘dry country’. The Negev is hilly, if not mountainous, poor in rain and with few sources of underground water. What rain it does receive drains to the east in narrow canyons and to the west along shallow wadis. Acsah knows that without water to irrigate your fields, land isn’t worth very much.

So after inspecting her dowry, Acsah adds an addendum. “Since you have given me land in the Negev, give me also springs of water.”

So Caleb’s endows his daughter with springs - not just one, but two - an upper and lower spring, a rare double source of available water.  A set of naturally occuring springs at different altitudes is a feature of the topography southeast of Hebron - and interestingly, excavations there in 1968-69 turned up lots of material from the time of the conquest.

Acsah's story is much more than historic trivia and a vignette of family life. Her request is about necessity, not greed. The point of this story in the Hebrew scriptures is that fair allocation of the land requires access to adequate water. Acsah’s demand to her father represents the plea of the powerless crying for justice from the king.

Justice is the life-blood of society as water is life for the land.

This story from Israel’s first occupation of the land illustrates one of the critical factors afflicting Israel and many other countries today – the scarcity of water resources.

I wonder . . . what would happen if government leaders everywhere were to commission the mothers and daughters of the land to resolve the scandalous disparities around access to water and to find equitable solutions that help family life to flourish?

Thanks, mom and dad, for all you did to raise a family - even when the land was dry.

7 comments:

  1. Thanks for the post. Indeed it is a good question you have posed today....my sense would be that we'd see a lot more diplomacy but that conflict would inevidably still be there. Wherever we have a limited resource of any kind greed will always rears its ugly head.

    Unlike Gordon Gekko in Wall Street I don't necessarily think that "greed is good" and (perhaps because I'm a woman)wish we had more diplomacy when manageing limited resources.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, the conflict will always be there, but I think that the mothers are often closer to the need and more driven to find solutions as well as perhaps being more relational and diplomatic in their approach.

    ReplyDelete
  3. David, you did ask a good question. It seems to suggest the answer you expect is that (for reasons that are more implied than express) women would deal with scarcity in a less confrontational manner, resolving conflicting claims and needs in some manner that mysteriously causes all needs to be satisfied by good will.

    Today, the news reports on a laboratory experiment of your theory, in which women find themselves having to address conflicting claims over a 'river of aid' that has opened up for families of the trapped Chilean miners. To put it mildly, the conflict management by those women does not validate your implied expectation.

    For the story, see:
    http://www.nationalpost.com/todays-paper/Miners+wives+lovers+clash+over+benefits/3476010/story.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. That's quite a story. "Oh what a tangled web we weave . . . " I suspect that it was the muchachoes more than the señoritas who wove this rat's nest of deception. On the other hand, "hell has no fury like a woman scorned." The she-bears will defend their young and their honor with vengeance. It won't be pretty when the men come home.
    Howvever, from the little I've read about community develepment work the involvement and empowerment of women is one of the most critical factors for local ownership and sustainable impact and effectiveness.

    ReplyDelete
  5. David, your question opens an interesting debate: Are women less confrontational or less greedy than men? Secondly, would a less confrontational, less greedy gender be better suited for resource management?

    Aug 16th you alluded to the conflict resolution of Abraham and Lot, over, water rights among other things; Yet space didn't permit you to mention that it was Abraham (not a woman) who resolve the conflict by giving Lot the choice.

    I propose that it is not gender that drives compassion and equity but rather personal perspective: the "she-bear" you mention in your comment "defends with vengeance" because her perspective is parental; Abraham gave Lot the choice because his perspective was eternal: He knew Who supplied the water and Whose promise was the bedrock of his life.

    I submit that the reason community development work better with the involvement and empowerment of women is not because of their gender but rather because of their personhood. The same development goals would not work if men were removed from the equation anymore or less than the removal of women.

    Fair resource management will only exist when we look beyond gender and governmental boundaries and raise our perspective beyond the short span of our own lives.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dan these are really good comments. Perspective is definitely a key aspect to ones response to shortage.

    Thanks for the follow up.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Here's an interesting video and movement called The Girl Effect. Check it out...
    http://www.girleffect.org/

    ReplyDelete